See a real technical proposal
Generated by Doaken on an actual French public tender — €1.8M structural works. 42 pages: cross-referenced track record, project team, deep foundations, sequencing, quality controls, waste management, scheduling.
Real public tender
Generated from an actual French public procurement contract, not a demo or mockup.
Full document
42 pages: methodology, organisation, references, planning, quality & safety.
Built in 30 minutes
The same proposal would take a bid team 20 to 40 hours to write manually.
Technical proposal example generated by Doaken
Excerpt from a 42-page technical proposal, generated for a French public works contract (structural works, €1.8M).
Doaken analyses the tender documents, identifies required submissions and evaluation criteria, then cross-references with the company's documents to produce a complete proposal tailored to the contract.
Each reference cross-checked against the tender's technical requirements
Doaken doesn't just list references. It reads the technical specifications, identifies the key technical constraints (deep foundations, cold-weather concrete, new/existing junction, public-use building) and cross-references each track record with those constraints — proving the company already masters exactly what the tender asks for.
Source: technical specifications + scoring criteria + uploaded certificatesThe table below cross-references the company's 6 major projects with the 5 technical requirements identified in the technical specifications. Each cell indicates whether the project includes that competency — proving a direct and verifiable mastery.
| Project | Value | Deep foundations (bored piles) |
Cold-weather concrete (Fasc. 65) |
New / existing junction (anchoring) |
Public-access building (safety) |
Renovation while in use (phasing) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aquatic centre Bar-sur-Aube — 24 months |
€6.85M | ✓ | ✓ | — | ✓ | — |
| Joliot-Curie high school extension Troyes — 18 months |
€4.50M | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Romilly sports complex Romilly-sur-Seine — 14 months |
€3.20M | ✓ | ✓ | — | ✓ | — |
| Arcis senior residence Arcis-sur-Aube — 12 months |
€2.80M | ✓ | — | — | ✓ | — |
| Brienne town hall Brienne-le-Château — 10 months |
€1.75M | — | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Ste-Savine school group Sainte-Savine — 11 months |
€2.10M | — | ✓ | — | ✓ | — |
| Coverage | €21.2M | 3/6 | 4/6 | 2/6 | 6/6 | 2/6 |
This project covers 3 of the 5 technical constraints of the tender. The description below details the elements shared with the targeted contract:
- Deep foundations: 58 bored piles Ø 500 mm, anchored 8 m into marl (same substratum as the Arcis site). Reinforced GNT 0/80 working platform.
- Cold-weather concrete: Project carried out over 2 full winters (2021-2023). Fascicule 65 protocol applied for 48 days at T° < 5°C. Zero concreting rework recorded.
- Structural complexity: Olympic pool 25 × 15 m in watertight concrete C35/45 XA2, resin lining, 60 cm raft. Curved formwork for stands — 1,200 m³ of concrete total.
- Public client: Communauté de communes du Barrois. Total budget €14M. Architect: ARCOS Architecture. Inspection: SOCOTEC. Hand-over without reservation.
Project team built from the company's CVs
The company's CVs and org charts were analysed. Doaken identified the relevant profiles, built the hierarchical org chart, and filled in the qualifications table — cross-referencing each person's skills with the tender's technical requirements.
Source: uploaded CVs + tender technical specificationsThe company assigns a dedicated team of 12 people, led by an experienced construction manager and a senior site supervisor. The entire management staff is on permanent contracts, ensuring continuity of supervision and technical control.
| Role | Qualification | Exp. | Assign. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project Director | Civil Eng. (ESTP) | 25 yrs | Oversight |
| Construction Manager | Civil Eng. (DUT + ESTP) | 15 yrs | 100% |
| Site Supervisor | HND Construction | 20 yrs | 100% |
| HSE Manager | Bachelor HSE | 8 yrs | 30% |
| Formwork Foreman | Formwork specialist N3P2 | 12 yrs | 100% |
| Mason Foreman | Masonry specialist N3P2 | 18 yrs | 100% |
Foundations sized from the tender's geotechnical study
The tender included a G2 soil report (pressuremeter tests). Doaken extracted the soil's mechanical properties, identified the load-bearing layer, and drafted a bored-pile method statement using the company's equipment — including integrity testing and standard acceptance criteria.
Source: G2 soil report + foundation specifications + EN 1997 (Eurocode 7)The G2-AVP geotechnical study reveals a load-bearing marl-limestone layer at 6.50 m below ground level (net limit pressure Pl* = 3.2 MPa, pressuremeter modulus EM = 45 MPa). Surface layers (clay silts, Pl* = 0.4 MPa) require deep foundations using bored piles Ø 600 mm, anchored at least 1 m into the load-bearing substratum.
| Layer | Depth | Pl* (MPa) | EM (MPa) | Nature | Behaviour |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Topsoil | 0 – 0.60 m | — | — | Loose humus-rich | Strip out entirely |
| Clay silts | 0.60 – 3.80 m | 0.4 | 5.8 | Plastic clay IL=0.7 | Water-sensitive, swelling |
| Limestone gravels | 3.80 – 5.50 m | 1.8 | 22 | Compact gravel | Intermediate, shaft friction |
| Marl-limestone (bearing) | 5.50 – 9.00 m+ | 3.2 | 45 | Compact marly limestone | Anchoring horizon |
Method statement drafted from the tender's specifications and the company's resources
The specifications require reinforced-concrete walls and solid floor slabs. Doaken cross-referenced these requirements with the company's equipment (PERI TRIO formwork, SCHWING pump) and drafted a 5-step method statement listing products, code tolerances and real-world productivity rates. Every specification is sourced (DTUs, Eurocodes, product data sheets).
Source: technical specifications + company equipment sheets + EurocodesThe superstructure is the technical heart of the project. It will be built in 10 weeks with a peak team of 14 people. Sequencing follows a bottom-up logic level by level, including reservations and embedments for follow-on trades.
Methodology tailored to the specifications — new / existing junction
The specifications mention a junction between the existing gymnasium and the new extension. Doaken flagged this critical point and drafted a 4-step protocol with the right materials (HILTI HIT-RE 500, diamond wire saw), quality control tests and acceptance criteria. Every step is calibrated against the relevant codes.
Source: technical specifications + EN 13670 + company lessons learnedThe junction between the existing gymnasium and the new extension is the most sensitive technical point of the operation. The protocol below details the 4 construction steps, validated on two similar projects.
Local constraints detected and addressed
The tender's schedule covers winter (Aube department). Doaken automatically built in a 3-tier cold-weather concreting protocol with the matching SIKA admixtures and a complete quality control plan with hold points.
Source: tender schedule + geographic location + Fascicule 65The Aube department experiences sub-zero temperatures between November and March (Jan average: -1°C to +5°C). The company applies a strict protocol compliant with Fascicule 65 and EN 13670.
| Parameter | Threshold | Implementation |
|---|---|---|
| Ambient T° | 5°C > T > 0°C | Concrete delivered at T° ≥ 15°C. Insulating tarps after pour. T° ≥ 5°C maintained for 72h. |
| Ambient T° | 0°C > T > -5°C | Accelerator (SIKA ViscoCrete). Heated water (fresh concrete ≥ 20°C). PU-insulated formwork. Stripping at D+3. |
| Ambient T° | T < -5°C | FULL STOP on concreting. No exceptions. Protect recent work + heating. Resume after T° returns > 0°C. |
| Frozen rebar | Steel T° < 0°C | Mandatory de-icing (propane torch or hot-air blower). Verification with infrared thermometer. |
| Phase | Check | Freq. | Type | Criterion | Resp. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earthworks | Subgrade bearing | Per zone | HP | EV2 ≥ 50 MPa | Lab + architect |
| Rebar | Compliance with drawings | 100% | HP | Ø, spacing, cover | Inspection bureau |
| Concrete | Slump (Abrams cone) | Every truck | CP | S3: 100-150 / S4: 160-210 | Site supervisor |
| Concrete | 16×32 specimens | 1 set / 50 m³ | HP | fc28 ≥ fck specified | Lab (7d+28d) |
| Junction | Pull-out tests | 10% min. | HP | ≥ load × 1.5 | Inspection bureau |
| Formwork | Verticality | 100% | CP | ± 5 mm / 3 m | Construction mgr |
HP Hold Point — works halted until approval CP Check Point — self-check with traceability
Site Organisation and Waste Management Plan
The specifications require a detailed waste management plan. Doaken cross-referenced expected waste types (concrete, steel, wood, packaging) with local waste streams in the Aube department, estimated volumes and drafted the segregation plan — including waste tracking forms and recovery targets compliant with French AGEC (circular economy) regulations.
Source: technical specifications + AGEC act + local waste streams (Aube 10)The company targets a 90% recovery rate (AGEC act target: 70% by 2025). Segregation is organised in 5 streams on site. All removals are recorded with waste tracking forms (BSD) kept in the project's environmental register.
| Waste type | Code | Est. volume | Tonnage | Treatment stream | Recovery |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concrete / inert rubble | 17 01 01 | 45 m³ | 85 t | Inert waste facility — SUEZ Troyes | 100% |
| Steel / scrap | 17 04 05 | 8 m³ | 12 t | Scrap merchant — DERICHEBOURG | 100% |
| Wood (used formwork) | 17 02 01 | 15 m³ | 3.5 t | Energy recovery — VEOLIA | 95% |
| Mixed industrial waste (packaging, PE film) | 20 03 01 | 12 m³ | 1.8 t | Sorting plant — PAPREC Aube | 70% |
| Hazardous waste (oils, solvents) | 15 01 10* | 0.5 m³ | 0.4 t | Hazardous collection — CHIMIREC (hazardous BSD) | Disposed |
| TOTAL | 80.5 m³ | 102.7 t | Overall recovery rate | 90.4% |
- 5 colour-coded skips: Inert (grey) — Wood (brown) — Metal (yellow) — Mixed waste (green) — Hazardous (red)
- Fenced segregation area at the site entrance, multilingual signage (FR/PT/AR)
- Traceability register: BSD no., date, type, tonnage, hauler, disposal outlet
- 15-minute safety briefing on waste segregation during onboarding of every new operative
- Monthly reporting to the architect: tonnage tracking table + cumulative recovery rate
Schedule aligned with the tender's contractual deadline
The tender imposes an 8-month construction period. Doaken generated a Gantt chart covering the structural-works phases, regulatory milestones (hold points, partial hand-overs) and inter-lot dependencies — all calibrated against the contractual deadline extracted from the tender regulations.
Source: tender regulations (deadline) + technical specifications (phasing) + standard structural-works scheduleSchedule built over 8 months (34 weeks), accounting for climate constraints (Aube winter), inter-trade interfaces and regulatory hold points.
| Phase | M1 | M2 | M3 | M4 | M5 | M6 | M7 | M8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Site set-up | ||||||||
| General earthworks | ||||||||
| Foundations | ||||||||
| Ground floor slab | ||||||||
| RC superstructure (peak) | ||||||||
| External masonry | ||||||||
| New / existing junction | ||||||||
| Internal masonry | ||||||||
| Structural finishings | ||||||||
| Existing building renovation | ||||||||
| Demobilisation / snagging |